Is war coded into our DNA?
By
James A. Haught
The
Charleston Gazette – 1/3/05
THE LATE
Sen. Jennings Randolph, D-W.Va., was portly, courtly and verbose - yet he had
wisdom. The first time I walked into his Washington office in 1959, I was
impressed by a small motto on his desk saying: "The most important lesson
you can learn in life is that other people are as real behind their eyes as you
are behind yours."
Randolph
cared about everyone's welfare. He entered Congress in 1933 and eagerly backed
President Franklin Roosevelt's New Deal safety net -- Social Security, public
jobs programs, the Civilian Conservation Corps, etc.
Later,
Randolph championed peace. He felt it was odd that America trained war
commanders at three national academies -- Army, Navy and Air Force -- but had
no government school training leaders in how to avert war. He crusaded many
years for a national Peace Academy, but few politicians were interested.
Finally,
in 1984 -- Randolph's last year in Congress -- he and colleagues succeeded in
creating the U.S. Institute of Peace (adding the proposal to a military
spending bill, so President Reagan couldn't veto it). But the institute today
remains unknown, insignificant.
Why
does America display so little interest in waging peace? With taxpayers pouring
$400 billion a year into the war apparatus, why is war prevention a microscopic
footnote on the balance sheet? Why does peace get a mere shrug?
Every
American, if asked, would say that he or she wants peace. But how real is that
desire? During election campaigns, hawks who talk tough get more votes than
doves advocating negotiation and compromise. Chest-thumping is popular. War
movies draw throngs. Did you ever see a peace movie?
It's
considered patriotic to support militarism, and disloyal to question it. In
ancient Greece, Thucydides described this effect. Athenian hotheads clamored
for an attack on Sicily, and doubters were deemed traitors. The invasion turned
out to be a disaster, ruining Athens.
Once, I
attempted to learn how many thousands of wars have been fought throughout
history. I contacted two international research institutes in Sweden and
Norway, but found that the question is unanswerable. Scholars think organized
warfare dates back about 7,000 years - but written records go back only 5,000,
and early ones are spotty.
Actually,
I assume that tribal fighting began with the earliest half-humans, and before.
Young male chimpanzee gangs massacre rival chimp colonies on nearby hills.
Since chimps are the closest biological relatives of humans, this probably
means that a fighting instinct is coded into human DNA. Presumably, the
fighting instinct helps humans survive - but it also kills off part of the
species.
Century
after century, millennia after millennia, wars have been fought for every
imaginable cause. The Thirty Years' War, which killed half of Germany's
population in the 1600s, began because Protestants entered a Prague palace and
threw Catholic leaders out a window into a dungheap. The War of Jenkins' Ear
erupted in the 1700s because a British ship captain showed Parliament his
severed ear, which had been cut off by Spaniards who boarded his vessel. In
1969, Honduras and El Salvador fought a four-day war over a soccer match,
killing 2,000. As for America's current war in Iraq, nobody really can explain
why it was launched.
During
the 20th century, wars killed an estimated 105 million people -- more than half
civilians. I'm sure all sides in every conflict felt patriotic, convinced that
their cause was righteous.
Veteran
war correspondent Chris Hedges touched a profound truth with his 2002 book,
<I>War is a Force that Gives Us Meaning<P>. "War makes the
world understandable, a black-and-white tableau of them and us," he wrote.
"It suspends thought." He said it maximizes "patriotism, often a
thinly veiled form of collective self-worship."
Aggression-fueling
testosterone obviously is a factor, since virtually all wars have been by
males. John Fowles wrote in <I>The Magus<P> that "men love
war... because it is the one thing that stops women from laughing at
them."
There's
hope. Some small, advanced nations seem to have progressed beyond warfare, even
though they had bloody pasts. For example, Switzerland had two gory civil wars
between its Catholic and Protestant provinces in the 1500s - and even had a
brief Catholic-Protestant civil war in 1847 - but has been at peace ever since.
Costa Rica abolished its army in 1949 after a civil war, and has grown
prosperous. Its president was given the Nobel Peace Prize in 1987 for his
attempts to spread the Costa Rica model.
In
America, a small fringe of people like Jennings Randolph struggle to resist the
war urge. I wish they weren't such an ignored minority.
<I>Haught, the Gazette's editor, can be reached by phone at 348-5199 or e-mail at haught@wvgazette.com.<P>